There is increasing commentary
recently about what it would look like if the RBA engaged in quantitative
easing (QE) if it runs out of traditional interest rate ammunition.
I am pleased that the RBA is lowering interest rates, making it cheaper for people, households, businesses and
governments to borrow. And yet, the talk of QE makes me nervous.
QE essentially involves the RBA
entering the market and buying up financial assets. This acts to reduce further
the interest rates on more assets across more maturities than could be achieved
through the RBA’s usual open market operations with short term securities.
By reducing longer-term interest
rates, the RBA will ideally suppress the exchange rate further and stimulate
further borrowing and spending by individuals, households, businesses and
governments.
Currently borrowers aren’t sufficiently
tempted by record low short-term interest rates. Nor are we in the midst of a
full-blown financial crisis. Instead it is entirely possible that the biggest
obstacle facing them is not the availability of cheap credit but a lack of
demand. Individuals aren’t confident about their future wage levels (demand for
their labour). Businesses aren’t confident about future sales (demand for their
products and services). Governments are also nervous about debt levels.
In such circumstances, ever-cheaper
credit won’t necessarily stimulate the real economy. It will more likely
over-inflate asset markets, including stocks and housing, as investors become
ever more speculative in the face of cheap credit.
This is what makes me nervous.
While I'm happy with what the RBA is currently doing, Australia needs a boost that
is sustainable, not a speculative one with potentially dangerous fallout.
This is why governments need to
step in with fiscal stimulus and structural reform before the RBA runs
out of traditional interest rate ammunition. This can include:
-
Progressing
with tax cuts and other financial supports for low and middle incomes
- Bringing
forward infrastructure spending, especially the smaller simpler projects that
can be started sooner;
- Reforms
such as the replacement of stamp duty, the simplification of building approvals
processes and planning frameworks, labour market reforms and incentives for
small and medium sizes businesses.
- APRA also needs to loosen its lending restrictions on banks from a 7 per cent borrower assessment rate to a simple 2.5 per cent buffer above the standard variable rate. This is the main obstacle to access to finance, not the RBA.
Unless governments can’t (or won’t)
capitalise on record low interest rates unless the RBA uses QE to reduce them
further, QE is likely to distort economic activity with questionable benefits.
Governments need to do this for
Australia before the RBA brings out the emergency measures. There is no
shortage of worthy recipients for stimulus and the potential consequences of
failure are mounting.
No comments:
Post a Comment