The stimulus and support being
provided by government to manage the impact of – and support a recovery from –
the COVID-19 pandemic is most welcome. So far the Australian government and the
RBA have announced a combined $189 billion of support and stimulus. Supporting
individuals who lose their jobs and facilitating key businesses to stay open
and hold onto their employees wherever possible, will be key to riding out the
storm and bouncing back as quickly as possible.
There is a dangerous incentive for
all levels of government once it appears that things have returned to normal,
to balance the books once more. It is crucial that this is not attempted too
soon. The raising of taxes and/or withdrawal of stimulus before a recovery is
far enough advanced can send the economy straight back down again. This will
not just inflict economic damage and human hardship, but can literally worsen
the very budget situation that the reversal of policy sought to address.
The last century is littered with
examples of premature austerity, including the last decade and even the last
few months:
-
Great
Depression – the US sent their economy back into recession in 1937 by
prematurely tightening monetary policy and attempting to balance the budget
after the Depression, an effort which “almost destroyed [FDR’s] New Deal”,
according to Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman.
-
GFC –
both the US and the EU turned to austerity in 2010, sending the EU into a
full-on repeat of the Great Depression, and the US into a recovery that was
much weaker and more prolonged than it should have been.
-
Japan
raised its consumption tax in October 2019 from 8 per cent to 10 per cent, contributing
to a annualised 6.3 per cent contraction in economic activity in the final
quarter of the year.
-
Australia
too, has limped through several years of weak wage and productivity growth, and
more recently sluggish economic growth following the housing downturn and
credit squeeze, while the Australian government preferenced a budget surplus
over further stimulus.
When economic activity is weak,
government spending has a much stronger impact on boosting activity more
broadly. The resources the government absorbs to undertake this spending is not
being taken away from the private sector – the private sector wasn’t using them
at all. It is pure stimulus. It is only when the private sector starts
competing for these resources with the government and bidding up prices, that
the government should consider withdrawing stimulus and balancing the books. In
other words, not until inflationary pressures emerge.
While these new debts will
inevitably have to be paid back, the interest bill on them is negligible, and
not just for short term debt. The RBA’s actions have brought the cash rate to
0.25 per cent and the 3-year Australian government bond rate to around 0.3 per
cent. Even before the RBA’s announcement of unprecedented stimulus, the 10-year
rate reached as low as 0.62 per cent on the 9th of March and the
30-year rate reached 1.16 per cent.
For a government to not be willing to
borrow and spend at rates this low is to suggest that they can think of virtually
no investment with a positive return. Even the borrowing required just to cover
the loss of revenue and increase in unemployment benefits that will come from
this economic downturn will be largely spent by people on goods and services,
thereby supporting economic activity – and government revenues.
Australia also has some of the
lowest national public debt levels in the world. With net debt at just 20 per
cent of GDP in 2018, this is equivalent to Switzerland (21 per cent); below
Canada (27 per cent), Taiwan (33 per cent), Germany (43 per cent) and Ireland
(55 per cent); and just a fraction of the UK (77 per cent), the US (80 per
cent), Italy (120 per cent) and Japan (a whopping 153 per cent).
In current circumstances, there is
no reason to think Australian public debt is going to become a bigger priority
than the economic recovery, so the economic recovery must not be tripped up for
the sake of the books.
No comments:
Post a Comment